House Republicans are in complete panic over the release of their January 6 communications


“While there is arguably a competing legal obligation or privilege that could override the subpoena, I know of no principle that requires any recipient of a subpoena to risk contempt in order to protect the interests of their clients. “, Mark Stern, formerly at the non-partisan office of House counsel, Recount The Washington Postby Greg Sargent.

It doesn’t take a brain surgeon to figure out what’s going on here. The GOP cover-up on what exactly happened on January 6 has turned from a campaign of disinformation to bona fide threats as the panel begins to get closer to the truth.

” He is afraid. And I think his boss is scared, ”California Rep. Adam Schiff told MSNBC of McCarthy and Trump. “They did not want this commission and this select committee to go ahead. They certainly didn’t want this to move forward because it’s on a bipartisan basis, and they don’t want the country to know exactly what they were involved in. “

But McCarthy isn’t the only Republican cracking up under the pressure. The guy who bragged wear a bulletproof vest at the rally on January 6 and tells Trump’s revelers to “start taking names and kick ass” has thoughts.

In an appearance on the right-wing Newsmax site, Representative Mo Brooks of Alabama argued he was “not at all worried” about his communications that day. However, he was quick to add: “I don’t believe they should be allowed to go on a fishing expedition, a witch hunt, a starry chamber – whatever you want to call it – an expedition, where they’re just trying to go after 10 members of Congress without following the probable cause requirements of the 4th Amendment. ”

Brooks’ loose association with the law likely caused him to distort probable cause requirements that do not actually exist to issue a summons. But he certainly threw a series of improper characterizations on the committee’s intention. Something for everyone, take your pick! Brooks just happens to be among the a dozen House Republicans whose files would have been of interest to the select committee.

Right next to him is Georgia Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene, another sight of calm in the eye of the storm. At Fox News this week, Greene told Tucker Carlson that telecommunications companies “that accept this”, that is, they obey the law, “they will be shut down – and that’s a promise.”

In fact, it is more than a promise. It is obstruction shrouded in threat, according to Norman Eisen, a former White House ethics adviser during Obama’s time. Which brings us right back to McCarthy.

“It’s Orwellian,” Eisen told Sargent of McCarthy’s bullying. “If these telecom companies didn’t comply with the requirement to keep these recordings, if they did what Kevin McCarthy wanted … it would be a violation of the law.”

“This raises serious questions under House ethics rules and other laws for Kevin McCarthy himself,” Eisen added.

Hey, sometimes to escape the law you just have to go ahead and break it – it’s a GOP rite of passage now.

$(window).load(function() {(function(d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); = id;
js.async = true;
js.src = “”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));})


Source link